Archive for the 'stephen frears' Category

Filed under: Cannes, Critical Thought & Trends, Newsstand

The 60th annual Festival de Cannes has concluded, and the Palme D’Or goes to … not the Coens? Despite all the praise and hype, No Country for Old Men was passed over for the prize in favor of 4 Months, 3 Weeks & 2 Days, an abortion drama that our own James Rocchi called “incredibly affecting, magnificently acted and superbly made.” Looks like he called that one. The Grand Prix, which is second prize, went to Naomi Kawase’s The Mourning Forest, a French-Japanese co-production that Variety says “had viewers and critics streaming for the exits.” The 60th anniversary prize, which is third place, went to Gus Van Sant’s Paranoid Park, a drama about a teen skateboarder in denial over having caused someone’s death. James reviewed that one too, but wasn’t exactly blown away by it. “I have to wonder when — or if — the fierce filmmaking of [Van Sant’s] earlier career will return,” he wrote.

Julian Schnabel took the best directing prize for The Diving Bell and the Butterfly, which has been snapped up by Miramax. Get a load of this line, again from Variety: “Perhaps imagining he was at the Oscars, Schnabel overstayed his welcome at the spotlight at least three times over, shaking the hand of every jury member, making his cast stand up and rambling as he thanked everyone he could think of.” The screenplay prize went to The Edge of Heaven, from a Turkish-German filmmaker, while the best actress prize went to Jeon Do-yeon, a South Korean actress who appeared in Lee Chang-dong’s Secret Sunshine. Best actor went to Konstantin Lavronenko for The Banishment. The jury prize was a tie vote between Persepolis, a French-U.S. production and Silent Light, about a mennonite community in Mexico.

At the jury press conference following the prizes, Stephen Frears was asked how Javier Bardem didn’t win the best actor prize, Frears joked: “He’s terrible, absolutely dreadful … he’s a wonderful actor. Why did we not give it to Javier? He owes me 500 pounds.” Sarah Polley and Toni Collette were also asked to defend their odd choices, with Polley saying “I’ve never seen so many people listen to each other so closely.” The jury also included Maggie Cheung, Maria de Medeiros, Abderrahmane Sissako, Marco Bellocchio and Orham Pamuk. If you want the full rundown, you can go to Variety and check it out.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Filed under: Drama, New Releases, RumorMonger, Celebrities and Controversy, Oscar Watch

Actor James Cromwell, who is doing press over in London for his role in Becoming Jane — which won’t open here for many more months — has given a wide-ranging interview to the Telegraph, and had some interesting things to say. He talks candidly about his role as Prince Philip in The Queen, and about his perceptions of the film in general, and how it was received in the U.K. He also accuses screenwriter Peter Morgan of having a strong bias against Queen Elizabeth and the rest of the royal family, and claims that ‘a lot ‘ of The Queen was ultimately cut because it was so strongly anti-royal. Cromwell also says that most of the people working on the film held, to his surprise, similar views. “I was very surprised that the overwhelming majority of the people on the set — how can I put this — loathed Diana,” he says. “Diana to them is the worst kind of English person you could possibly be.”

Cromwell also says that most of his performance as Philip in the film had to be dubbed, with re-looping on every line, because he couldn’t get the accent straight. “Oh, Jesus, I worked my ass on it. My problem was that you cannot make a mistake when you are playing Philip in one sound, because if you do, the reality goes out the window.” Other topics covered in the interview include Cromwell’s role in Becoming Jane, the television show 24, which he says he has “real problems” with, and his political views. He claims to know that America’s last two elections were rigged, and says he can’t handle living here anymore.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Filed under: Comedy, Drama, Foreign Language, Independent, Music & Musicals, Awards, Mystery & Suspense, Oscar Watch

The DGA announced its noms a few moments ago, and I, tragically, had only one right: Martin Scorsese for The Departed. The five official nominees (drum roll, please):

Martin Scorsese (The Departed)
Bill Condon (Dreamgirls)
Jonathon Dayton and Valerie Faris (Little Miss Sunshine)
Alejandro Gonzalez Innaritu (Babel) and
Stephen Frears (The Queen)

Well, well, well. I suppose it’s not shocking that the DGA nommed Condon for Dreamgirls — they did, after all, shell their award out to Rob Marshall in 2002 for Chicago — but I’m disappointed that they’d nom Condon over Cuaron. Oscar tends to march to the DGA’s beat on Best Director (they’ve been a matched set for five years running), so it’s a pretty safe bet that whoever ends up with the DGA’s big gold plate will be counting their chickens in the days leading up to Oscar night.

This was largely a crap shoot, but I am rather shocked not to see Eastwood’s name up there. Scorsese wasn’t a shocker — every last film journo whose predicitions were listed on Oscar watch had him on their lists.

My other predictions were Clint Eastwood (for Letters, not Flags), Paul Greengrass (United 93) and Alfonso Cuaron (Children of Men), and Guillermo del Toro for Pan’s Labyrinth — I was really hoping the recent critical surge for both those films might give them a leg-up, but alas, it was not to be. The Hollywood Reporter’s Anne Thompson came the closest to nailing all five — she’s just that good, folks. She was the only hold out who didn’t have Eastwood on her list — the rest of us had him as a shoo-in, but clearly she pegged that one.

The only thing Thompson missed was the Dayton-Faris nod — to give cred where its due, only Jeff Wells from Hollywood Elsewhere pegged that one (and no doubt he’ll be crowing over it, but we’ll grant that he has the right to do so). I’m surprised by that nom (especially in light of Cuaron and del Toro, the other two of the Three Amigos) getting the cold shoulder, but nonetheless delighted for the Little Miss Sunshine gang — that film is just the little movie that could.

So, now that the noms are announced, who do you think will win? And will the winner take the Oscar, to boot?

**UPDATE: I should have looked closer at the predictions grid (that’s what I get for writing before I’ve had my coffee). A second glance showed me that Thompson wasn’t the only one whose crystal ball was in top form. Five other pundits scored 4/5, all of them missing only Little Miss Sunshine. The other top predictors were:

Scott Bowles (USA Today)
Pete Hammond (Hollywiretap)
Kris Tapley (InContention)
Sasha Stone (OscarWatch)
Susan Wloszczyna (USA Today)

Permalink | Email this | Comments